Page 306 - Friedman Archives
P. 306

306                             “Custom” (Gear icon) Menu Settings


           license the format from us, and in exchange we’ll give you the information
           we need to make your lenses play nicely with our current and future camera
           bodies!”

                 rd
           Most 3  party lens manufacturers complied, but at least one manufacturer
           (okay, it was Sigma) said “Nuts to that!” and they went ahead and reverse-
           engineered  the  Minolta  lens-to-body  protocol,  creating  their  own  chip
           which seemed to mimick the Minolta lens behavior perfectly.  (They did
           this with the Canon and Pentax lens mount protocols, too.)  Nothing wrong
           with that, I guess, but it seems that some of the Sigma lenses “lied” about
           their identity to the Minolta camera body.  A 500mm f/4.5 Sigma lens, for
           example, might communicate that it was a Minolta 400mm f/4.5 lens to the
           camera.  This strategy didn’t seem to impact camera behavior, so Sigma
           continued  this  approach  for  many  years.    Minolta  was  peeved  but
           consumers liked their Sigma lenses, and for the most part the Sigma lenses
           worked fine on most Minolta camera bodies .
                                                  2
           Fast-forward to today.  Sony introduces cameras with the Micro-adjustment
           feature, but are VERY worried that attaching such an aforementioned older
           Sigma  (which  lies  about  its  identity)  will  overwrite  the  values  of  a
           legitimate Minolta or Sony lens, unbeknownst to the user (“Hey, why did
           my Minolta 400mm f/2.8 lens’s micro-adjustment values get changed when
           I tweaked the micro-adjustment values for my older Sigma 500mm lens??”)
           And  so,  Sony  issued  this  cryptic  warning  saying  simply  “Don’t  use  this








               2  (Historical note: Sigma’s strategy never caused a problem until the year 2000, when
                  Minolta  updated  the  lens-body  protocol  to  allow  ADI  (Advanced  Distance
                  Integration)  flash  metering  to  work  properly.    Suddenly  the  reverse-engineered
                  Sigma  lenses  wouldn’t  work  on  the  new  bodies.    Sigma  handled  the  deluge  of
                  customer complaints swiftly by agreeing to re-chip the non-compliant lenses for
                  free, and it is assumed that Sigma paid the official licensing fee from that point on,
                  realizing  that  it  was  cheaper  to  comply  than  it  was  to  handle  all  of  these  chip
                  upgrades.  So new Sigma lenses aren’t plagued with compatibility issues like the
                  older lenses were.)

               Contents of this book Copyright © 2014 Gary L. Friedman.  All rights reserved.
   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311